Diavolo

Welcome

I would like to add that magic is considered a preamble to philosophy. Years ago I read a study carried out by the University of Costa Rica. In it, I studied a hypothesis about the development of the prefrontal lobe of the human brain thanks to the consumption of entheogens. Our ancestors, during the food collections and the constant testing of both what can be eaten and what not, discovered psychoactive substances, giving rise to the first shamans of the communities, rituals, and culture. Magic continues to be practiced bilaterally alongside philosophy and alongside science. In my opinion, they are complementary: different epistemologies that are traveled to reach a shared goal, which is Knowledge. Now, I couldn't go on without first defining what Mind is. Let us not try to reveal the black thread of this issue, which still does not have a forceful answer, at least from the plane of philosophy and science. However, I am convinced that it is possible to build together a shared starting point from which we can continue to address the issue. Without a concept of Mind, 'how can we talk about everything that contemplates it within its becoming? Your answer is very clear. I would like to read what you will write is better.

First of all, I absolutely love this type of content. I am very excited to read this, so I will try to stay calm and write as structured as possible, although I don't promise much. Now, let's begin. First point: Is it possible to say that I have a philosophy; that I have developed it? Or would it be best to say that philosophy has me and that it has developed me? Who uses who? This from Lacan's perspective, if I'm not mistaken, that he talks about how language is the one who speaks us and it is not us who speak it. If the second scenario were true, perhaps we could affirm that by discovering the philosophy that operates us, we could also discover the veil that hides our destiny. If the former were true, there would be the option to choose what and how to think, and that would make us responsible, to a certain extent, for our destiny. Second point: Regardless if I depart from the idea that it is possible to choose, a mere assumption that does not convince me because I do not believe in freedom, ergo I am a determinist; or not, I also share the Socratic paradox that says "I only know that I know nothing". This Socratic Aikido is quite useful within any ethical/moral framework. However, I also share the Aristotelian principle of practical knowledge because it seems to be quite useful to proceed within what we may call Reality. Aristotle is the father of science and that is why he considered the possibility of accessing practical truths. For example fire burns and if you throw something where there is gravity, the object will fall. We only can survive through axiomatic principles like these. Third point: To answer your question, I consider myself a deterministic materialist. The material conditions in which a person or society grows determine to a large extent the possibilities of accessing or not accessing certain types of practical truths and certain types of moral and/or ethical interpretations.

We all are ignorants, somehow. I think that the problem is wanting to continue dwelling in such a state of ignorance despite having new tools and new evidence at reach. I value your appreciation for this post

Well, first of all, thanks for reliving this post. It is very important that people read it. Second, I think that the people who visit this site have their own criteria, and for something they are adults. If they had daddy issues and needed a 60-year-old cyber-dad, pseudo-goth, I think they wouldn't be here, but on Tinder. I see that you are very bored and despite your age, you need the attention and validation that your mother never gave you. It doesn't matter, my old boy that almost smells like a corpse, I'll be here to entertain you. You already tired me with your baseless harassments.

Sup

How are you, people? I wanna share this theme that I produced with you. Consider listen to it when you get a chance. See... Ya!

By the way, I will leave another scientific search engine to strengthen point number 3: ---- --- http://www.jurn.org/#gsc.tab=0 ---- ---- Keep waiting for updates on this Post!

4) Ignore the person if he or she is unable to be reasonable! Among adults, arguments are necessary to carry out a talk. This shows respect among the interacting people. If anyone has no arguments, he or she will proceed to insult; to carry out Ad Hominem attacks. No need to continue the talk or waste time with someone who is incapable of reasoning. Proceed with your life!

"Scientists and politicians, as well as celebrities, can receive a number of incentives to support and promote the agendas of others" What scientists? What companies? What celebrities have reached such behavior? I do not doubt that what you say is possible, however, one must have evidence at hand in order to discredit those involved. Otherwise, it only falls into reductionism and very generalism, which are of no use to clarify an issue, but to spread fear. Which, paradoxically, is what creates the dystopia you speak of. “The very fact that many scientists do not question the findings of others can be traced back to who is financially supporting their research. If they do not agree, their funding could be cut off. " I agree. This is known as utilitarianism, and it has happened. However, the same: you do not provide precise information about it. Please, share evidence. “The creation of the false Wuhan / Covid19 narrative has been used to create a sense of despair and chaos within society. Society is being manipulated to redesign it and turn it into something easier to control " I don't know what sources of information you consume, could you share them? What is a false narrative? You do not clarify anything you mention. You just throw words into the air. If you could quote credible examples and sources, we would all appreciate it. How do you know what you know? How do you carry out your investigations? What are your credentials? Otherwise, sadly,I would only be inclined to think that your ideas are nothing more than conspiranoic and unfounded.

It is almost an excellent question, well ... is it possible not to be interested in what is being talked about? If so, why would a person commit to offering an answer, if the subject is indifferent to him/her? Who does not feel affection for cars, can not find commenting anything about engines in car forums. Or if? Perhaps boredom and lack of direction; of a sense of life, lead someone to carry out such behaviors, but since they do not have much to contribute, the community itself would realize how irrelevant their contributions are. Now, is the credit benefit all that there is an incentive for an individual to intervene in one way or another on an issue? I already quoted an example that could prove that this is not the case. Nobody is paying me to write this, for example. And I am doing a type of political activism since politics refers to both individual and collective actions that give order to a state and/or a group of individuals in order to achieve a common goal or to solve a problem. In politics, power is not only played in the form of money. Influence is also played as a means to be able to change the behavior of other beings, to achieve an end both of its own and of a collective, to reaffirm its own belief, to discredit those who are in power for reasons of envy; ideological. We all do politics, even by not participating in a social process, which ends up affecting us anyway.

Hello, dear adult human beings. I welcome you to this little tutorial. I am going to teach you how not to believe the first thing that is presented to you on the Internet as true information. Even question this that you are about to read. Before, let's talk a little about the infodemic. According to an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology, A&R, whose link I will leave at the end of this article, The term infodemic is used to refer to the abundance of information on a specific topic. The term is derived from the union between the word information and the word epidemic. It is related to similar concepts such as fake news or intoxication, as the amount and exposure of these intensify We all know the typical person who does not review the information that comes to him/her and spreads it, adopting it as true, without first verifying it. 1.- Detect if the person is an authority or not on a subject. Surely you have met 1 or more people who are shown as carriers of the truth in some group. Not bad. The first thing you can do is ask for their credentials. Perhaps it is an authority on the subject. Otherwise, it is highly likely that it is someone who only expresses his/her opinion and her personal projections towards a specific topic. 2.- After requesting the above, it is best to request the sources on which the comments are based. If he or she is an authority, it is highly likely that he/she shares specialized texts on the subject of which he/she speaks. Otherwise, the information does not have sufficient support to be taken seriously. Next, I will leave a few pages to be able to verify the veracity of the sources of information obtained. 3.- Use of scientific search engines, my friend. Any subject can do a search on Google, but, in case you didn't know, Google has its own scientific search engine. There, you will only find information that is validated and exposed in reliable media; used by researchers across the globe. https://scholar.google.com/ Scientific seekers there are a lot. Don't get caught up in ordinary Google, which is used to search for cat videos and tik tokers. Well, that's it! Now you are less vulnerable. If you think I have missed any points, please let me know. Always remember to discuss serious issues with reliable sources of information. Be responsible with the information you share, you never know who can read it. Greetings, mortals! Scientific source about infodemic: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/art.41468 Verifiers:

In the area where you live is still infeasible to get a space for your band to play?

Damn it, bro. I hope you don't let the music down.

Thanks a bunch, mate!

I forgot to mention that it is electronic music 😎

I just uploaded this song that I made. It is good, according to the judgment of friends and not so friends, so your time will not be wasted. Greetings to all mortals.

I can see you guys had fun making the video. The music is good. The spray part and the kick part seemed like a good touch, not counting the vocalist's gesture, jajaja. That was pure gold. Horns up, bro!